I was excited to buy Ghost in the Machine after
reading the description of the story and some of the early reviews as there’s a
part of me that really thrills to what I perceive to be the adventure and interesting,
peculiar tech of steam punk.
There is another novel with a very similar title,
The Ghost in the Machine, written by Arthur Koestler, and published in 1967. It’s
essentially about the mind-body connection from a philosophical psychology
perspective and I was curious to see if S.J. Davis’ book would mirror this
idea. There are actually many other novels with this title.
From the outset, Ghost in the Machine is an
action-packed, steam punk, time-travel
mystery. Davis intertwines
settings between Victorian England 1865 and a future time 2134 when
developments in the Victorian time come to have negative outcomes in the
future. It is about the chrononauts of the future travelling into the past to
alter actions that were the inception of the despotic control mechanism of
OmniCorp.
Davis’ characters are very believable regular
people that embark on an amazing adventure. Caroline and Josephine are very
good foils as one is of higher social standing and concerned with keeping her fashionable
hat in perfect order while Josephine is an intelligent tutor; however, they
both come together in that they like to get down to brass tacks. Bodhi,
Josephine’s foster brother, is a clock repairman and inventor. The story expertly
weaves the reader in and out from the events in 1865 and the lives of Yeshua
and Nico who are determined to escape the control of OmniCorp in 2134.
The reader is swept through a Victorian London
replete with dirigibles, gas lighting, and mechanized fighting robots, to 2134
where everyone is on the ‘feed’ and micro-chipped. We find the characters moving
between past and future and visiting each other’s timelines, and eventually,
the timelines becoming mixed up.
Davis addresses many issues including determinism
versus free will, the conundrum of time travel and how changing things in the
past can change the future, and many difficult social issues of both time
periods.
I found the novel had a dark undertone in that
there is a focus on the lower aspects of life. The reader is made fully aware of
London’s gin houses, prostitution and different sexual practices (Madame
Francesca and her brothel are an important element of the book), many aspects
of the drug culture, cutting, and the stench and filth of London’s streets as
well as OmniCorp’s off-grid back streets. While these elements are without
doubt a part of life, I found this focus somewhat depressing after a while.
There are also numerous typos throughout the book,
and some words are missing.
The ending however is quite amazing. And I learned
something very curious; that a certain emerald green dye used in wallpapers and
clothing in the 1800s was very toxic, causing early death (no longer
used).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Welcome comments!